Previous Page  29 / 60 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 29 / 60 Next Page
Page Background

doing so adds value to the

decision making process of

the Board.

The Board, having received

the recommendations of the

panel, makes its decision on

which projects will be funded,

to what level, and with what

conditions (if any) attached

to the funding. Deeds of

Funding are then entered into

between the Authority and the

successful applicant. These set

out the conditions of funding,

including planned milestones,

deliverables, and payments .

Projects are monitored over

the course of their lifetime

by the Authority, including

site visits, reviews of reports,

or other such reviews as are

appropriate to the project.

A final review is undertaken

before the final payment

is made for each project.

Payments are made in

two ways:

• Projects receiving less

than $50,000 in Authority

funding are paid in advance,

generally 60-80% as an

up front payment, with

the remainder paid on

successful completion of

the project.

• Projects receiving more

than $50,000 are paid in

arrears, upon completion

of milestones. Evidence

of milestones being

completed is required.

A project portal allows the

projects to report, share

information, provide invoices

and apply for modifications

to their project electronically.

This process provides an

efficient means to monitor

project delivery and record

payments.

Each year a small number

of projects are selected

for independent audit.

Independent auditors are

also brought in if serious

concerns are noted with

regard to the delivery or

management of a project.

Outcomes

In the first four years of

projects funded through

the Authority, 189.4 hectares

of land area was the focus

of clean-up projects. The

work undertaken on this

land area included pest plant

eradication and riparian

planting.

A total of 1.1 million native

plants and trees were planted

in association with 137

projects from years one to

four.

Fencing of restoration planting

and wetland creation in the

first four years amounted to

85.2 kilometres. The Authority

has a fencing standards policy

to guide project managers.

In the first four years of

funding $22.4 million was

granted to clean-up projects.

For every dollar allocated,

an additional $1.42 of co-

funding or in-kind support was

matched from other funding

sources.

2013

2014

• Multi agency tuna restoration project for the

lower Waikato River gets underway

• Restoration of whitebait spawning habitat

on the Mangati Stream carried out

• One further iwi environmental plan and one

fisheries plan funded

• Guide for willow and alder management

produced

• Pest plant clearance over an area of 152

hectares carried out

• Restoration of wetland within Otorohanga

township leading to the Waipa River

• Pest fish reduction and riparian planting

carried out at Lake Ngaroto

• Twelve kilometres of river bank pest

plant clearance carried out

• Sustainable milk plans for a further 845

dairy farms jointly funded

• Funding allocated for a comprehensive

restoration strategy masterplan for the

Waikato and Waipa rivers funded

• Twenty-nine hectares of wetlands

created

• Restoration of Eastern Whangamarino

wetland carried out

• Restoration and planting of a major

wetland complex bordering the Waipa

River at Te Pahu carried out.

27

Waikato River Authority

Five Year Report

2015